mastersolz.blogg.se

To me, it’s the right thing to do.Īll through Phase IV I trusted the Army, who repeatedly told me that the goal was to identify the best performing camouflage solution. I’ve conducted my analysis of alternatives and I’ve made my case as to why I feel that adopting MultiCam is the best Course of Action for the US Army. It’s like the “throw away” COA that guys developed when they are in school during MDMP. The shake and bake option #3 is ridiculous. Yes, in the current, post Phase IV, case of the US Army’s quest for a new camouflage pattern, I have a MultiCam bias. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.īoth comments and pings are currently closed.ġ55 Responses to “UCP-D:This Is What Happened The Last Time The US Army Created A Pixelated Camo Pattern” On Monday, March 10th, 2014 at 09:25 and is filed under Camo, PEO-Soldier. It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to figure this out.īelow are two photos of UCP-Delta. When it was all said and done, they turned to MultiCam. The Army conducted wear tests of UCP-D and MultiCam in Afghanistan. Prior to this beauty, the Army unleashed the Universal Camouflage Pattern on the world. It’s from the last time the US Army created a pixelated Camo pattern.

Since some folks have such a short memory and think the Army’s scheme sounds like a good one, I’ll show you a couple of photos of the UCP-D variant. There’s talk of the US Army creating a “Digital MultiCam” pattern in order to avoid paying Crye Precision for a license to use their MultiCam camouflage pattern that has seen use in Afghanistan since 2010.